Saturday, March 3, 2012

My Thesis Problem Statement


This is the "problem statement" for my thesis - an introduction of sorts.  Would love to hear thoughts on it, questions about it.  Two more months til my MA!

One of my burning questions as a history teacher is how to help students think about prejudice.  Although the United States has made vast improvements over the years, prejudice is still clearly a dire problem: the achievement gap remains pervasive, people of color continue to report widespread discrimination, rising anti-immigration sentiments alienate and demonize Latinos, women continue to be oppressed by everything from objectifying media imagery to the glass ceiling, Asian’s continue to be lumped into a homogenized whole in which important cultural differences are made invisible, Muslims continue to be stereotyped as terrorists and have trouble finding places to build new mosques, and LGBT children continue to suffer from bullying, homelessness, and even suicide.  

These are merely examples of prejudices reported on by major news channels.  Anyone listening to pundits from Rush Limbaugh to Rachel Maddow on a regular basis will have heard these topics covered (for better or worse). Some prejudices are talked about often, such as sexism, racism, and homophobia.  Other prejudices are hardly talked about: for example, prejudices against elders, youth, or differently-abled people.  Many prejudices remain virtually invisible, such as those against people who have been incarcerated.  Meanwhile, prejudice itself is widely misunderstood, and the psychology of prejudice, so fundamental to understanding its pervasiveness, remains discussed almost entirely by specialists.  

The alleviation of prejudice, in its many varieties, depends on our society gaining a wider and deeper understanding of how prejudice works.  Citizens who have not given serious thought to how prejudice functions may be condemned to repeat it, or at the very least, misunderstand it – unconsciously – and thus allow for its continuation.   If prejudice was always explicit, if it was easy to see and understand, perhaps it would not require consistent, concerted serious thought to overcome.  However, because prejudice is complex and subtle, it must be thought about seriously on a society-wide level. 

Major questions our society should be asking include “what would a serious analysis of prejudice look like, and how could we create a country where many citizens have engaged in such analysis”?  One long-run plan for reducing prejudice in this country would be for schools to develop ways to help students think seriously about prejudice.  If prejudice was seriously analyzed in schools across the country, and if students gained a complex and subtle understanding of prejudice, that could go far in alleviating the problem. 

As a history teacher, I’ve been considering what a serious analysis of prejudice would look like in a history class.  There are many ways to analyze prejudice through history, some of which work better than others.  I am especially interested in how the critical and historical thinking skill of contextualization can help students better understand prejudice.  I have a hunch that if students can learn to analyze how a given social context facilitates the rise and maintenance of a certain prejudice in history, that they could transfer this type of analysis to other periods of history and to the contemporary world.  Perhaps students that learn to contextualize prejudice will develop a more sophisticated understanding of it – an understanding that goes beyond simple judgments of good and evil, and instead towards the details of how prejudice arises, is maintained, and diminishes.    

At the time of this writing, I am not a full time teacher, but am volunteering in a sixth grade world civilizations class.  Due to the context that I find myself in, I have been considering not only contextualization, but how to help students think about prejudice in the context of ancient civilizations.  I have been wondering if understanding how prejudices functioned in ancient civilizations can help students better understand prejudice in general, i.e. help students understand prejudice as part of the human condition, and thus help them understand prejudice in contemporary settings.

I think that examining prejudices in the context of ancient civilizations may have major benefits, and may even help prepare students to think about prejudice in American history.  In an American history class, students examine prejudices that have taken place in the history of their own society.  Because contemporary prejudices can be traced back to historical ones, an analysis of these prejudices can also be emotionally loaded.  In an emotionally loaded context, judgments come easily, making analysis difficult to practice.  In an ancient civilizations class, the subject of prejudice may carry less of an emotional charge, potentially making the subject easier to explore and analyze.   Practicing the analysis of prejudice in ancient civilizations could lay the groundwork for doing so in American history classes.  Additionally, in an American history class, students have the opportunity to watch how prejudices evolve.  In ancient civilizations classes, rather than analyzing the evolution of prejudices, students have the unique chance to compare a variety of prejudices and the contexts from which they sprung and were maintained.  This would also lay important groundwork for future examinations of the subject.    
Comparisons of prejudice in ancient civilizations, when contextualized, would also expose students to prejudice as part of the human condition, rather than as something only certain societies have had or only bad people have had.  By widening their understanding of what prejudice looks like and preparing students to see prejudice in many contexts, these comparisons may help students perceive prejudices in their own society that receive less attention.  Finally, it is under-acknowledged that we live in a globalized society in which prejudices from all around the world exist.  Learning to contextualize a variety of prejudices from around the world may help students learn to navigate prejudices in their communities that remain invisible in the common discourses on prejudice in this society.

Given these thoughts, the question I want to explore is how do middle school students understandings of prejudice develop as they learn to historically contextualize prejudice in the context of a sixth grade ancient civilizations class?

4 comments:

  1. Off-the-cuff thoughts: great topic! However, it'd be nice if you gave a couple examples of prejudice in past societies, to give us some context.

    Some other points: seems like the statement could be cleaned up and made more succinct. You use the word "prejudice" a LOT - maybe you could use the pronoun "it" a bit more often?

    You might want to start by giving at least a rough definition of prejudice, and bring our own story about your previous work with students closer to the beginning. I remember your anecdote about teaching your students about past racist attitudes in US and how difficult that can be - it could be helpful to include that here, as background.

    In the classes, is "prejudice" mentioned in the context of the systems of oppression in which it occurs? I see the role of such prejudice as maintaining certain hierarchies and privileging some people. Eg looking at prejudice against blacks as part of the system of white supremacy - looking at its origins in the system of slavery and the control of poor whites in the South by the slave-owning ruling class, and how that system has been used to benefit employers by dividing the working class. (I am, after all, a leftist. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's my opinion this is not nearly as strong as your previous post. Prejudice is not a problem. You can't contextualize it. It is context. It (nod to previous commenter) is not a problem in the sense of constituting a thesis topic. That kind of problem defines a goal and asks how it can be accomplished. Working on that kind of problem means defining the goal, and the context, in some detail. I second Mr. Mackerel's suggestion that you provide examples of what you are describing conceptually.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your comments guys - sorry it took me a few days to reply. Martin, I'll likely take you up on your suggestions - I left out definitions of terms on purpose because those are discussed extensively in the next section - a thirty page lit review - but it would only mean adding a few more sentences to this problem statement, as it is officially called, and I think it would help.

    Tom, I don't understand what you mean by saying you can't contextualize prejudice and that prejudice IS context. Whatever types of prejudices exist only exist as they do because they have arisen in a certain world - a certain context - that allowed for them to make sense. My thesis is an investigation into how history teachers can help students learn to contextualize prejudice, meaning, in how to help students analyze the social world of a given time and place that created the conditions for a certain prejudice to make sense. Perhaps that wasn't clear in my post or still isn't clear?

    ReplyDelete
  4. the easiest and most useful way to approach prejudice that I have found, is the psychological approach. rather than starting with a conception of prejudice as good, or bad, or a problem, we start from the neutral ground of wanting to understand what need it fulfills, because all psychological behaviors are essentially strategies for meeting psychological needs. so, what need does prejudice seek to fulfill? when I ask that question, I see clearly that different people use prejudice to satisfy different needs. some use it is a means of social cohesion, some for congnitive stability, and some don't use it as much as they have been programmed with it. so, prejudice is not one thing. so first comes the understanding that what we are calling prejudice is really a label for a series of behaviors and traits which have common elements.

    so, next we ask what those common elements are. obviously, I'm a fan of Socratic dialogue. I feel, especially with younger people, that giving them the opportunity to discover answers is much more likely to re-engage their interest in the subject. so, moving through common elements, we find that which elements we perceive as common change with our own perspective. in that space, we maybe come to a slow realization that prejudice is not really anything we can put our fingers on. it is an amorphous expression of a wide variety of internal impulses, and that really, the usefulness of this information is only in realizing that we cannot determine what is prejudice in others, only that which is prejudice in ourselves. as such, we are not responsible for curbing prejudice except in ourselves.

    all of this needs to be directly distinguished from inequality, which is not prejudice, even if it does sometimes arise from prejudice. inequality must be understood on its own, as a non-psychological reality, which is objective and measurable, and inevitable. it can be shown through the socratic method to be gradient in nature, with true equality available only in mathematics and to a lesser degree in quantifiable systems.

    I would advise against defining prejudice or inequality. in my exprience, what made middle school boring for me, was that the teachers framed all of the discussions, and defined all of the terms, and that left no room for kids like me to engage the material in a space of curiosity and discovery. I hope all is well with you Lynn. I hope we can chat sometime soon when I return to CA.

    ReplyDelete